Our Story is as Good as The Witnesses - Piglia

 This novel was somewhat of a change in what we have been reading so far, I definitely enjoyed this one a lot. Piglia tells the true story of robbers and through his focus on their drug abuse and other reckless actions, he paints an image of what it means to be a criminal. 

Piglia's brutally honest depiction of the robbers worked to reveal their motives for this robbery, a desire to leave their old lives behind. They all seem to have some sort of affliction whether that be drugs, sexual perversions, criminal pasts, or mental problems. Piglia paints a psychological image of them which in turn offers as an explanation for their wild behaviour and blatant disregard for human life as shown during their robbery. Dorda is an especially afflicted character as he is a very nervous person as displayed in their escape. This brutally honest revealing of these characters gives us a slight passage into their past and shows why some people might enter this line of work. Piglia did not glorify these men to be these smart and conniving criminals. He showed the stupidity of some of their actions like the frenzied car chase, shooting their guns everywhere. This seems as though it wasn't very well thought out or thought out at all since it would draw so much attention to them. This is in part probably because they are all hopped up on drugs. 

Piglia's use of outside perspectives on the robbery was a unique way to add in another informational aspect to the story, even if the witnesses accounts weren't always true accounts. I think this shows how blown out of proportion some things can get when it is by word of mouth. One person says one thing and another adds 3 new aspects to the story as it gets passed along. Perhaps this could also make the reader question the narrator/author. After looking into Piglia's story regarding this novel, I found that he was actually sued by Droda's real life daughter for the way he was depicted in the story. This made me wonder whether or not Dorda was actually gay or not/how much of his story was true, or how much of other characters stories were altered for entertainment purposes. It also makes me wonder what the reasoning was to change their stories if he did? Was it in fact for entertainment or did it serve as a means to alter our perception of these characters. Of course our view of these characters would probably change had we been given more depth to their pasts, we'd probably be able to understand their reasoning for justifying their actions a little better. But we don't get that backstory, just as the public doesn't either. All those people who lived at the same time that this story happened didn't get to hear what made them this way. It's because of this that we only see half of the picture and think how could they be so sadistic? 

I am in no way justifying their behaviour btw, that shit was crazy.

My question for you: Would you have viewed their actions differently if Piglia had made the characters have remorse for those they killed? 

Comments

  1. Daniel OrizagaMarch 19, 2024 at 10:21 PM

    ¨I found that Piglia was actually sued by Droda's real life daughter for the way he was depicted in the story.¨ There are many parts of Dorda's history that we will never know, and that allows for speculation in fiction. In fact, many of these topics are touched upon in depth in Prof. Beasley-Murray's lecture. How important are the authors he talks about to understanding what Piglia is trying to show in this book?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Give My Girl a BREAAAAKKK: Rodoreda

          Rodoreda’s “Time of The Doves” is a story of love and loss, and the desperation that ensues when one must carry such a heavy weight for so long. I must say I was shocked when Natalia was about to kill her children and herself, but it goes to show that when we are pushed so far beyond our limits, we change as a person and the beliefs or personality traits that once defined us either become void or heightened in moments of fight or flight . Not even Natalia’s children could keep her desire to live after what she had to endure. Ultimately, this is a story of the tragedies of life and war and the toll it takes on the mind and body.  One instance where Natalia's desperation truly comes to fruition is when she plans to get rid of the doves as she can no longer take their chaos. This seems like such an extreme way to handle her issue with the doves, killing their young. Natalia could have chosen to talk to Quimet about it (although he probably wouldn’t have heard her complaints
Read more

I'd have a parasocial relationship with a hot poet too

Luiselli’s novel navigates the trials and tribulations of keeping her creativity alive while performing  her motherly duties. She also explores just how blurred the lines between reality and imagination can become when one becomes obsessed with their means of escapism, which in her case is the poet Gilberto Owen. Through her movement through different liminal spaces and the switch between first-person narration, we see how the obsession consumes her. Her navigation of these spaces causes the reader a sort of confusion at first wondering what is real and what is imagined. I found this a tad bit hard to follow but found that it only added to the narrative of losing yourself in escape. Her fixation on Gilberto points to how we can form these fixed ideas of people who we don’t even know. The mother fabricates this image of him in her head, creating these encounters that never really happened. This reminded me of the parasocial relationships that people tend to form with celebrities. I mean
Read more

To Dust We Return: Bombal's "The Shrouded Woman"

Bombal’s novel dives into the realm of death by weaving memories into an intricate story of life. This story ultimately is a testament to who Ana was, her phases of life, and how they all fit into a greater force than ourselves.  The Shrouded Woman is a rebuttal to Breton’s novel, "Nadja" which we read last week . It directly opposes the notion of women as a thing to be glorified and men as the driving purpose in a woman's life. She opposes the view of love in Latin America during that time and the expectations that came with it. On page 226 she says; “Why, oh, why, must a woman’s nature be such that a man has always to be the pivot of her life?” She states that it is not the sole means of fulfillment for women but it denies them of their personhood, their ability to shape their own independent lives. Ana also mentions how when Ricardo left her, she went to go kill herself, her life wasn’t worth living without the presence of a man. The relationship between Ana and Zoil
Read more